So finally, finally the verdict is out and I guess most of us would appreciate this judgment. Even if we differ in the interpretations and perhaps on the judgment in itself one thing is for sure, We are living in Different Times and Times are no more the same. India is different in 2010 to what it was in 1992.
So what could have been the verdict apart from the present judgment? Could the High Court have given a statement that ok what happened on 6th of December 1992 was wrong but just for the larger interest let's move on and build a Temple there? Could the High Court have gone on the other side of the debate by terming that act as barbaric and ordered re-building of that mosque? Hypothetically yes but if you are honest with yourself both of this could have never happened and will never happen. That is why I feel this is perhaps the best judgment in the present circumstances.
But before we ponder over this a little more, we need to once in and for all agree to few facts:-
1> There was indeed a Dilapidated Temple to start with at that Site.
2> There was indeed a Mosque been built over the ruins of that Dilapidated Temple.
3>Babri Masjid was indeed demolished on 6th December 1992, and for Heaven's sake we should term that as a demolition of mosque and condemn it rather that term it as demolition of disputed structure and condone it.
4> What happened on that particular day (6th December 1992) was indeed barbaric and utterly shameful.
5> But it is time to move on now for sure. Agreed what happened was barbaric, agreed it was shameful but then what to do now over that. Let us accept it that these things do happen however unpleasant it is but we cannot just let these things allow us to keep us back.
6> By this I am not one bit justifying but rather suggesting it is time we as India move forward.
7> And Finally let us now not go on those semantics of "Grand Temple" and "Grand Mosque" and not try to out do each other but rather concentrate on building something which is much more humane and relevant.
Once we agree to this we need to find how we interpret this judgment. Do as part of some reconciliatory gesture get the judgment tweaked just to address the grievances of the other community, Do we now go to Apex Court and look for one final verdict once again even if that means waiting for another generation or perhaps sit across the table, iron out mis-giving’s and do what the High Court has asked it to do.
As much as I would not like but it seems to me at the moment that the First Option will be finally in place. There will be claims and counter claims on the verdict but an out of court settlement now cannot be ruled out once they fight it out in the Apex Court.
Discussing the second option is indeed a good temptation. Let the debate go in the Apex Court for another generation or two and let India emerge more mature and more inclusive and let us then accept the same judgment from the Supreme Court. It is indeed a good idea but all can go awfully bad if the Supreme Court delivers a different verdict and gets it totally towards one community. Take it from me we will be far more divided then to what we are now. It will be the worst possible thing to happen then and that is why I strongly feel not to go for that.
I for once would back the last option. Let this be the last time we discuss this age old issue and let us all pray that as India we move forward and get this past bogey out of our mind share.
My last word on this verdict goes to Mr. S.U.Khan who while delivering the verdict said "That much before 1855 Ram Chabutra and Seeta Rasoi had come into existence and Hindus were worshipping in the same. It was very very unique and absolutely unprecedented situation that in side the boundary wall and compound of the mosque Hindu religious places were there which were actually being worshipped along with offerings of Namaz by Muslims in the mosque".
If we could have been united then when Britisher's were ruling us then why not now when we are Free, Resurgent and More Prosperous India.
JAI HO!!!